Posts: 340
Threads: 52
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
Which is better, Handcoding is very time taking and difficult, which one is better and more efficient? Dreamweaver (similar softs) or handcoding?
Posts: 161
Threads: 14
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation:
0
I am using Dreamweaver CS3. I think it's better for handling the scripts. With Dreamweaver you can find mistakes faster than by handcoding cause of colours in Dreamweaver and shown errors etc...
Posts: 667
Threads: 11
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
0
Dreamweaver offers you the chance to view both, the image and the code itself. You can also handcode with dreamweaver, so I don't see why you should even make such thread as this.
Guest9328472398472
Unregistered
Dreamweaver - Easier & Quicker
Both are good in some places. Dreamweaver is for fast website developing and handcoding is for an accurate website. I prefer handcoding with Notepad++ which might be different from yours or others.
Posts: 3,304
Threads: 58
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
0
In notepad++ you just have some tabs and some options at the top of the program and the rest is the file you're editing. In Dreamweaver there are over 9000 toolbars and other stuffs that only fill up your screen.
So yes, handcoding.
Posts: 3,312
Threads: 33
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
0
well nothing wrong about handcoding
but doing it in dreamweaver can be way more efficient, you just shouldn't get distracted by all that stupid buttons and functions it offers
and just keep handwriting it but using the efficient autofills and stuff(don't forget checking what it has done though)
Posts: 3,934
Threads: 353
Joined: Jan 2010
Reputation:
0
Handcoding is so much better. Dreamweaver is for cheaters and lazy people!