Dreamweaver vs handcoding - Printable Version
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: Other (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Everything and Nothing (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Dreamweaver vs handcoding (/showthread.php?tid=312592)
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: Other (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Everything and Nothing (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: Dreamweaver vs handcoding (/showthread.php?tid=312592)
Dreamweaver vs handcoding - SourceCode - 22.01.2012
Which is better, Handcoding is very time taking and difficult, which one is better and more efficient? Dreamweaver (similar softs) or handcoding?
AW: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - ThomasTailor93 - 22.01.2012
I am using Dreamweaver CS3. I think it's better for handling the scripts. With Dreamweaver you can find mistakes faster than by handcoding cause of colours in Dreamweaver and shown errors etc...
Re: AW: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - Haydz - 22.01.2012
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ThomasTailor93
 I am using Dreamweaver CS3. I think it's better for handling the scripts. With Dreamweaver you can find mistakes faster than by handcoding cause of colours in Dreamweaver and shown errors etc...
|
If you use programs like notepad++ you're able to get the syntax highlighting.
Re: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - Max_Coldheart - 22.01.2012
Dreamweaver offers you the chance to view both, the image and the code itself. You can also handcode with dreamweaver, so I don't see why you should even make such thread as this.
Re: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - Guest9328472398472 - 22.01.2012
Dreamweaver - Easier & Quicker
Re: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - T0pAz - 22.01.2012
Both are good in some places. Dreamweaver is for fast website developing and handcoding is for an accurate website. I prefer handcoding with Notepad++ which might be different from yours or others.
Re: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - SourceCode - 22.01.2012
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CookieJar
Dreamweaver offers you the chance to view both, the image and the code itself. You can also handcode with dreamweaver, so I don't see why you should even make such thread as this.
|
Re: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - Hiddos - 22.01.2012
In notepad++ you just have some tabs and some options at the top of the program and the rest is the file you're editing. In Dreamweaver there are over 9000 toolbars and other stuffs that only fill up your screen.
So yes, handcoding.
Re: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - saiberfun - 22.01.2012
well nothing wrong about handcoding
but doing it in dreamweaver can be way more efficient, you just shouldn't get distracted by all that stupid buttons and functions it offers
and just keep handwriting it but using the efficient autofills and stuff(don't forget checking what it has done though)
Re: Dreamweaver vs handcoding - Luis- - 22.01.2012
Handcoding is so much better. Dreamweaver is for cheaters and lazy people!