About y_timers
#1

Well..

Is y_timers more optimized? i mean what is better to use y_timers or settimer (default) ?
Reply
#2

https://sampforum.blast.hk/showthread.php?tid=494831


On the first page of "Scripting Help"
Reply
#3

I do not know how timers can be more optimal, y_timers By ****** is simpler and safer.
Reply
#4

thank you anou1.
But what means 'secure'?
Reply
#5

Read this thread.
Reply
#6

Just note, that anything from YSI package is soaked with macros => resulting in longer compile time. But the positives outweight the negatives.
Reply
#7

The compile times are (insignificantly) slower so that your coding is faster - that is still a net gain in time. I am firmly of the belief that you should make the compiler do the hard work for you. It is there to make your life easier, not the other way around.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)