About y_timers - Printable Version
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: About y_timers (/showthread.php?tid=495068)
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: About y_timers (/showthread.php?tid=495068)
About y_timers - SnL - 15.02.2014
Well..
Is y_timers more optimized? i mean what is better to use y_timers or settimer (default) ?
Re: About y_timers - anou1 - 15.02.2014
https://sampforum.blast.hk/showthread.php?tid=494831
On the first page of "Scripting Help"
Re: About y_timers - FreakyFlan1990 - 15.02.2014
I do not know how timers can be more optimal, y_timers By ****** is simpler and safer.
Re: About y_timers - SnL - 15.02.2014
thank you anou1.
But what means 'secure'?
Re: About y_timers - FreakyFlan1990 - 15.02.2014
Read this thread.
Re: About y_timers - Misiur - 15.02.2014
Just note, that anything from YSI package is soaked with macros => resulting in longer compile time. But the positives outweight the negatives.
Re: About y_timers - ColeMiner - 15.02.2014
The compile times are (insignificantly) slower so that your coding is faster - that is still a net gain in time. I am firmly of the belief that you should make the compiler do the hard work for you. It is there to make your life easier, not the other way around.