[Djola]

Can you guys made SAMP to handle about 1000 players maximum .500 is a small.There is a lot of players.If it is possible.Please make it in another samp update

[Steamator]

More Player = Requires better server = Fail

[Finn]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steamator More Player = Requires better server = Fail

?

SA-MP jumped from max. of 200 players to max. of 500 players, I don't see why we can't jump up to 1,000 in the next version.

[Steamator]

Did you see a server with 500 players (most of the time of day)?

[Calgon]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steamator Did you see a server with 500 players (most of the time of day)?

Yes, I've seen multiple servers peaking at ~500 players.

[Finn]

That Russian community has three 500-slot servers which all are almost full all the time, that means ~1,500 players online.

[DiDok]

Everything is possible but it'd require NASA computer to handle it (MTA and 65535 players limit LMAO xDDD)

[SkizzoTrick]

LS-RP had 500/500 almost all the time before being attacked by DDoS
This would be awsome to raise the limit to 1000

[DVDK]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DiDok Everything is possible but it'd require NASA computer to handle it (MTA and 65535 players limit LMAO xDDD)

MTA Doesn't even have 65535 total players..
But why would we update to 1000, if only 1 person can reach it?

[Calgon]

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVDK MTA Doesn't even have 65535 total players.. But why would we update to 1000, if only 1 person can reach it?

You mean server? If so, then you're wrong, because multiple servers regularly peak at around 500.

[Krx17]

1000 players would be a huge load on the server, the host, and the network engine SA:MP uses. I doubt Raknet was designed to go near 1000.

[Cactus2010]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krx17 1000 players would be a huge load on the server, the host, and the network engine SA:MP uses. I doubt Raknet was designed to go near 1000.

Price and your own doubts are no reason not to try upping the player limit. If you can't afford it, don't use it. But if you can, why should you not be able to host for 1,000 players? :P

[SkizzoTrick]

Look,the 0.4 should be like:

Quote:

Sa-Mp 0.4 Extended(1000) Sa-Mp 0.4 Normal(500)

Who wants to keep it with 500 will download the normal edition
Who wants to keep it with 1000 slots will download the Extended edition

[Calgon]

[xxmitsu]

There is an hacked edition of windows server witch has 1000 players limit. But I haven't tested it yet (no need to do that for the moment as 500 limit is more that enough for me).

[DVDK]

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxmitsu There is an hacked edition of windows server witch has 1000 players limit. But I haven't tested it yet (no need to do that for the moment as 500 limit is more that enough for me).

Ofcourse there are hacked ones, but they will be blacklisted from the masterlist.

[Djola]

Next Generation gaming always have 450/500 players

[Djola]

And You Calgon was on NGG.:{

[Sergei]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkizzoTrick LS-RP had 500/500 almost all the time before being attacked by DDoS This would be awsome to raise the limit to 1000

They haven't even reached 500 yet.

[SkizzoTrick]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sergei They haven't even reached 500 yet.

They did
I was waiting 15 minutes to get a slot.
This happened lot time ago,now there are arround 400-450 players