[Calgon]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bakr At everyone bitching about it being MW2.5, or a base off of other games; shut the fuck up already! Who cares? Why would you fix something when it's not broken? MW3 just broke records with the number of copies it sold within 24 hours, so obviously they don't need to fix something based on a few opinions of Battlefield fans or overall trolls. If you are a battlefield fan, tell me, what's so different in BF3 than BC/BC2? The overall gameplay still feels the same. There are many neat aspects, such as the realism in lighting and animations, but most average gamers don't pay attention to them. You don't even notice most of the differences that people point out at making BF3 be such better game than MW3. Seriously, if you're just going to bitch about it being the same thing, shut the hell up. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Don't cry, it's just a game.

In short:

Quote:

Now that Battlefield 3 is working properly (almost) its vast, strategic warzones are utterly gripping and visually splendid; it is astonishing to close in on a distant firefight only to see an RPG round take out the front of an entire building. But Modern Warfare 3 offers the instant thrills and dumbass logic of the great arcade shooters. And it packs in masses of value, whatever you think of the controversial multiplayer system.

BF3 introduces Battlelog, much higher quality graphics, 3D capabilities for PC, an amazing physics engine (does CoD? didn't think so), great and realistic destruction, an amazing (yet short) campaign, vehicle warfare and many other better features than CoD.