TRIANGLE.GS, SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM [UPDATED]
#21

I wouldn't trust any of them with my servers, for the simple fact they're free, and poorly built.

If you're hosting a server which means a lot to you do not host any of these hosts.
Reply
#22

The one which we can trust on his sa-mp.gs.
Want to know why?
Because it is run by woot, which had, in the past, run samp4free.

The design of the website isn't bad.
The grammar errors there are 0[I didn't found any].
And there is no "kids" controlling it.


Ultra host or whatever is it called, No.
Wanna know why? SQL Injection vulnerabilities, kids controlling it, and a freaking ugly website design.


However, if you want to host a server permanently, go with a paid server.
Just use free servers for testing purposes.
Reply
#23

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kikito
View Post
The one which we can trust on his sa-mp.gs.
Want to know why?
Because it is run by woot, which had, in the past, run samp4free.

The design of the website isn't bad.
The grammar errors there are 0[I didn't found any].
And there is no "kids" controlling it.


Ultra host or whatever is it called, No.
Wanna know why? SQL Injection vulnerabilities, kids controlling it, and a freaking ugly website design.


However, if you want to host a server permanently, go with a paid server.
Just use free servers for testing purposes.
I usually use free server as my temporary script (BETA) and make my server popular and I'll ask one of my friend to pay me a VPS for it. So, free servers are for testing/developing.
Reply
#24

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kikito
View Post
The one which we can trust on his sa-mp.gs.
Want to know why?
Because it is run by woot, which had, in the past, run samp4free.

The design of the website isn't bad.
The grammar errors there are 0[I didn't found any].
And there is no "kids" controlling it.


Ultra host or whatever is it called, No.
Wanna know why? SQL Injection vulnerabilities, kids controlling it, and a freaking ugly website design.
pff however the grammar or the website may be, the user is still getting his free server? However may twisted the ToS can be, the applier still gets his server! Now just because sa-mp.gs is lookin' cool, would you apply there? What if, there are no ports over sa-mp.gs (3 locations) and you are forced to use Ultra-H? If I get my product with good condition however it comes by, I just don't give a fuck.

*And how do you know Ultra-H's owner is a kid?
Reply
#25

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sublime
View Post
*And how do you know Ultra-H's owner is a kid?
Because 90% of the *hosting companies* are managed by kids[ physically and / or mentally]
And, a good looking website is half way to be successful.


Once again, if i was going to test my gamemode in a free server provider, i would go with sa-mp.gs.
I had a previous experience with samp4free and it was good, i still remember it like it was yesterday.

That's my opinion. Don't rage with it.
Reply
#26

Quote:
Originally Posted by carz0159
Посмотреть сообщение
im relatively certain x86 is 64 bit
x86 is 32bit and x64 is 64bit
Reply
#27

Quote:
Originally Posted by carz0159
Посмотреть сообщение
Yes, but were talking about OSs and x86 refers to 64 bits and x64 refers to 32 bits. ( if i remember correctly.)
OS wise x86 is 32bit, x64 is 64 bit. I have no clue why, but that is how it is.
Reply
#28

Quote:
Originally Posted by justsomeguy
Посмотреть сообщение
OS wise x86 is 32bit, x64 is 64 bit. I have no clue why, but that is how it is.
Alright.

How many slots do they offer? And is it instant setup?
Reply
#29

Quote:
Originally Posted by XProtocol
Посмотреть сообщение
For some reasons I don't trust these companies. Why don't you go for other ones out there?
If you don't trust a free service run by an old and well-known member of the SA-MP community, in which no personal information or even your gamemode is given (only the .amx) then I think you should probably sell your computer and convert to an Amish life because you sound like a way-too-paranoid person.
Reply
#30

Quote:
Originally Posted by khanz
View Post
I wouldn't trust any of them with my servers, for the simple fact they're free, and poorly built.

If you're hosting a server which means a lot to you do not host any of these hosts.
I couldn't have said it better myself. If you're going to own a server pay a little more and get a trusted company!
Reply
#31

(Small bump, but obviously people don't know the simple difference system data frequencies...)

Guys....


x86 is a 32 BIT processing system, x64 bit, well this is pretty obvious, and the answer could have been found by doing some simple googling..
Reply
#32

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt.TheDarkness
View Post
(Small bump, but obviously people don't know the simple difference system data frequencies...)

Guys....


x86 is a 32 BIT processing system, x64 bit, well this is pretty obvious, and the answer could have been found by doing some simple googling..
And it has been answered already.
Reply
#33

Quote:
Originally Posted by saiberfun
View Post
And it has been answered already.
tl;dr


Making things more simple for the kiddies since 2008 mmkay.

Quote:
Originally Posted by slaker191a
View Post
this is the best TDM GAMEMODE
http://adf.ly/dIwZs
OR VIST SAMP FORUME
http://******************/gamemodes/deathmatch/
They get smarter and smarter each day...
Reply
#34

All of you saying ultra host is shit, stfu, you base your opinion about ultra host on pure shit.

I've used ultra host to host my server, and, other than them being hacked, it was great and the site is now more secure.

Let's say the owner is a kid, honestly? that's just fucking stupid.
Reply
#35

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeXian99
View Post
Ultra-H.com
Advantages of Ultra-H.com
3. Easy to get (Once you requested, done within 10 minutes, guess so)

Disadvantages of Ultra-H.com
1. Hard to get a server.
- Why I say this? I just checked this and its IP is 91.215.156.155ort, there's not much port for you, like about 10~15 (lazy to count)
Anyways, Ultra-Host is better.
Reply
#36

x86 is the CPU architeture family.
x86-86 is for 64-bit systems such as Opterons.
Look it up on the actual compatibilities of the OS
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)