Posts: 2,175
Threads: 235
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
0
What do you mean?
Define something in a macro?
Posts: 2,175
Threads: 235
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
0
I think you are going to define #define example to #define anotherexample 1 so no that no have so much sense.
What do you want to do with that definition? maybe another way to do it
Posts: 367
Threads: 55
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
0
No other way, there was just a quick example and I need only that way.
Posts: 2,175
Threads: 235
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
0
Yea but why you have to define a definition that no have sense
Posts: 367
Threads: 55
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
0
Who cares if that makes sense, I just want to know. If you can't help, then don't post.
Posts: 2,175
Threads: 235
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
0
I already say that you can't do that.
But i want to know why you have to do that for help you maybe make a better code
Posts: 48
Threads: 2
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
0
Definitions are processed in pawn pre-processor, so no, you can't do it, and there is no reason why you would want to do that.