[Gammix]

Y_INI vs. eINI vs. DINI2
If the benchmarks are wrong, you may share yours or correct them, i haven't really used Y_INI or any INI processor.

Benchmarks code:

pawn Code:

#include <a_samp>

#include <YSI\y_ini>

#include <eini>

#define INI_FILE_TIMEOUT (3000)
#include <dini2>

main()
{
    new s, e;

    // Y_INI
    // Writing
    s = GetTickCount();

    new INI:handle = INI_Open("Test.ini");
    for (new i; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set1", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set2", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set3", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set4", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set5", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set6", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set7", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set8", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set9", "Gammix_Changed");
        INI_WriteString(handle, "Set10", "Gammix_Changed");
    }
    INI_Close(handle);

    e = GetTickCount();
    printf("[Y_INI] Write string to 10 fields 100000 times -> %i ms", e - s);

    // Reading
    s = GetTickCount();

    for (new i; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        INI_ParseFile("Test.ini", "LoadFile");
    }

    e = GetTickCount();
    printf("[Y_INI] Read string from 10 fields 100000 times -> %i ms", e - s);



    // eINI
    // Writing
    s = GetTickCount();

    handle = INI::OpenINI("Test2.ini", INI_WRITE);
    for (new i; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set1", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set2", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set3", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set4", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set5", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set6", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set7", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set8", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set9", "");
        INI::WriteString(handle, "Gammix_Changed", "Set10", "");
    }
    INI::CloseINI(handle);

    e = GetTickCount();
    printf("[eINI] Write string to 10 fields 100000 times -> %i ms", e - s);

    // Reading
    s = GetTickCount();

    handle = INI::OpenINI("Test2.ini", INI_READ);
    for (new i; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set1", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set2", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set3", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set4", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set5", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set6", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set7", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set8", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set9", "");
        INI::ReadString(handle, "", "Set10", "");
    }

    e = GetTickCount();
    printf("[eINI] Read string from 10 fields 100000 times -> %i ms", e - s);
    


    // DINI2
    // Writing
    s = GetTickCount();

    dini_Create("Test3.ini");
    for (new i; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set1", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set2", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set3", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set4", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set5", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set6", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set7", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set8", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set9", "Gammix_Changed");
        dini_Set("Test3.ini", "Set10", "Gammix_Changed");
    }
    dini_Timeout("Test3.ini");

    e = GetTickCount();
    printf("[DINI2] Write string to 10 fields 100000 times -> %i ms", e - s);
    
    // Reading
    s = GetTickCount();

    dini_Create("Test3.ini");
    for (new i; i < 100000; i++)
    {
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set1");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set2");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set3");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set4");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set5");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set6");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set7");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set8");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set9");
        dini_Get("Test3.ini", "Set10");
    }
    dini_Timeout("Test3.ini");

    e = GetTickCount();
    printf("[DINI2] Read string from 10 fields 100000 times -> %i ms", e - s);
}

forward LoadFile(tag[],key[],value[]);
public LoadFile(tag[],key[],value[])
{
}

Results:

Code:

[15:59:11] [Y_INI] Write string to 10 fields 100000 times -> 2944 ms
[15:59:19] [Y_INI] Read string from 10 fields 100000 times -> 8173 ms

[15:59:20] [eINI] Write string to 10 fields 100000 times -> 965 ms
[15:59:21] [eINI] Read string from 10 fields 100000 times -> 838 ms

[15:59:21] [DINI2] Write string to 10 fields 100000 times -> 833 ms
[15:59:22] [DINI2] Read string from 10 fields 100000 times -> 870 ms

@Yashas: I guess you were wrong on you claiming this WAY WAY WAY slower. Its alot faster than YINI and step further than eINI even with such syntax it supports.