Posts: 232
Threads: 55
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation:
0
I'm confused about something, is Dini easier to use than Yini? When I was using Yini I didn't really understand it, but I heard that Dini is a lot easier to use and it's much simpler. Can someone shed some light on whether that's true or not?
Posts: 3,715
Threads: 358
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
0
I don't think so, try to understand y_ini and you'll know that it is more efficient than dini.
Dini in my opinion is easy, simple, but it is fuckin slow, y_ini is complex, it is efficient and fast.
Use y_ini, dini is slow.
Posts: 2,698
Threads: 37
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
0
It depends on the use you do with the include. Both are equally fine for me, however in specs, y_INI seems much better than d_ini. However, for small purposes I'd go with dini.
Posts: 843
Threads: 61
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
0
Do not use dini because it is so slow, and it saves data on so weird way. Creating temp. files instead of saving it in memory is a bad idea. Use y_ini or MySQL.
Posts: 360
Threads: 31
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
0
DINI is way harder (in my opinion) to use then Y_INI.
I suggest using Y_INI, and Y_INI only.
Posts: 760
Threads: 22
Joined: May 2011
Reputation:
0
Y_ini is complicated in my opinion on only one thing: INI_ParseFile. But once someone actually explains it, most of the things melt down into your head. :P Did on me at least, did a registration/login tutorial and didn't know what everything actually meant but that was how I learned how to even script in pawn.
Also it might be a Dota - League of Legends fight in-between them. The first one you use might be the one you will start use, so make sure it's y_ini. :P