Posts: 655
Threads: 49
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation:
0
well... u got me in fog... i got the basic bounty system from SanAndreas MoneyGrub, LandGrub, DM ... and could say the code instead of arqueing and Beczy , thnx
Posts: 1,290
Threads: 69
Joined: Dec 2006
Reputation:
0
They wern't negative, if you don't want help then don't post. I know fine well that if i didn't post those 3 points you would have kept the return statement, you would have not checked if there was a killer and you would have kept the max cells in the array as 200. So now that i have pointed those 3 things out to you you have saved on efficiency and time (time = not having to type return 1 when you didn't need to on most of the existing callbacks. So.. how was my reply negative?
@ RobbyMeist3r: Yes 2 of the points i posted wouldn't have have changed the visual effects to players but all 3 of them would increase efficiency. So why get the hump? Is it because i am helping make the way people code BETTER? Jees you people should seriously think before posting.
Posts: 10
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
1) Has nothing to do with the help he wants. You answered to the guy Pixels who had a good solution, and if return 1; has no effect, it doesn't bother anything, so you could post that little "tip" in the General Reference topic or something.
2) That one's true.
3) Not pointless to have MAX_PLAYERS, it doesn't make the code less useful. It'd be less useful if he didn't have MAX_PLAYERS, as you suggested.