[M3ntaL]

Is there any way to encrypt MD5 with Whirlpool ?

I've figured that out on PHP , but cant find a way to do it with pawno...
Using MD5() with INSERT wont work, it wont whirlpool hash it, it just MD5 hashes...

Example:

Код:

format(Query, sizeof(Query), "INSERT INTO `Accounts` (Username, Password) VALUES('%s', MD5('%s'))", EscapedName, buf);

and

Код:

WP_Hash(buf, sizeof (buf), MD5_Hash(inputtext));

This just wont work..
Any ideas ?

[Lenny the Cup]

why would you want to double-encrypt passwords? One encryption is well enough.

[Calgon]

Whirlpool can't be cracked. You really don't need to use MD5 in combination with Whirlpool.

[M3ntaL]

I know that, but too much security wont harm.

[DeathOnaStick]

Quote:

Originally Posted by M3ntaL I know that, but too much security wont harm.

There is no 'more' security than wp_hash. It's the maximum security you can have, when crypting a file. There is no use to use md5 in combination, cuz md5 can be encrypted.

[Calgon]

Actually it will, you're 'harming' the script by slowing down execution time by calling 2 cryptography algorithms, one redundant and one good.

[M3ntaL]

It is possible somehow, I just have not figured it out yet. The cracking of Whirlpool is just a matter of time. It CAN be cracked eventually.

[Calgon]

Quote:

Originally Posted by M3ntaL It is possible somehow, I just have not figured it out yet. The cracking of Whirlpool is just a matter of time. It CAN be cracked eventually.

Have fun with that, when you can't even figure out how to fix this issue.

[legodude]

omg for this time im with calgon :O

whirpool is good enuf

[M3ntaL]

Lmao, problem fixed... No need to continue spamming.