SF is a good town town for roleplay?
#1

Hello i'm Nielsbon1,

And i had a question about the town SF.
I am starting a roleplay gamemode and i saw that everything is los santos.
But i dont like los santos so muchs i love SF because it's smaller then los santos.
So it dont get a ghost town.

Who thinks that sf is a good town for RP?
Reply
#2

i definatelly prefer LS ..but SF is good for rp too..
Reply
#3

Well, it depends. Los Santos is overused yes, but San Fierro is a bit boring in my opinion. You can try Las Venturas + Desert.
Reply
#4

Depends on the Roleplay.:P If it's about farmers and shit, DESERT + LV.

But i still prefer LS as a RP city, but i definitely hate roleplay xD
Reply
#5

Well I think SF would be good for like a hobbo life (They have this small streets with dumpsters and small houses etc..)
Reply
#6

It's for a friend That wants to make it.

But he asked me but i'm not sure if he must do it.

He want's to make it and he wants to be a hardcore roleplay.

[He pay's me 7$ ] after it's done 30 $
Reply
#7

I think you should use all the little towns/villages in the desert + LV, atleast they're not overused..
SF = Boring
Reply
#8

Unless you expand upon the SF map, it'll be boring. SF is a great place, but it lacks the kind of places that are required for gangs and whatnot. There's a limited amount of gangs that can really be placed within SF, as there's hardly any deprived looking neighborhoods.
Reply
#9

EDIT: Sorry for double post, I'm lagging
Reply
#10

Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayON
View Post
Depends on the Roleplay.:P If it's about farmers and shit, DESERT + LV.

But i still prefer LS as a RP city, but i definitely hate roleplay xD
Em, I don't think farmers belong to Las Venturas, they belong to Desert. No, Las Venturas is good for a Mafia/Casino/Nightlife RolePlay.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)