19.04.2009, 14:10
ok, i have this question for you people.
why am i see hundreds of scripts with ANTI-money hack, while you can make it impossible to hack.
instead of having script kiddies ( yes, not hackers, u should know that ) their money and then banned, make it impossible to hack it.
u dont have to tell me its impossible, because i choose the second method.(that makes money hack impossible to hack)
so question 1: why are scripters/programmers still using anti-money hack, instead of the other.
question 2: since variables are server sided, why not replace all client variables with server side variables,
it would have advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages:
no hack on variable possible, (variable processed on server)
more power in script, since u can change all variables seperately
disadvantages:
MIGHT reduce performace
increases script filesize(ses)
so my burning question is: why anti, when there is impossibility?
why am i see hundreds of scripts with ANTI-money hack, while you can make it impossible to hack.
instead of having script kiddies ( yes, not hackers, u should know that ) their money and then banned, make it impossible to hack it.
u dont have to tell me its impossible, because i choose the second method.(that makes money hack impossible to hack)
so question 1: why are scripters/programmers still using anti-money hack, instead of the other.
question 2: since variables are server sided, why not replace all client variables with server side variables,
it would have advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages:
no hack on variable possible, (variable processed on server)
more power in script, since u can change all variables seperately
disadvantages:
MIGHT reduce performace
increases script filesize(ses)
so my burning question is: why anti, when there is impossibility?