[HyDrAtIc]

As titles says it.

Isn't it better if they reduce the time between posts?

it keeps annoying.


Who agrees me?

[freddy smyth]

It protects against spam pretty well. I think the pace of the forum isn't very quick, but it suits well because there is a lot of information on it and it would otherwise be hard to track so much different information.

[HyDrAtIc]

What I mean, REDUCING, not REMOVING.

I hope you understand what I mean over here.

[dannyk0ed]

Just wait..

[Jstylezzz]

Reducing for everyone seems a bad idea to me, because newbies can post spams and bumps even quicker. If it's reduced, then reduce it by postcount (10 seconds per 100 posts or something, like that, and the lowest it can go is one minute or something). And, the fact that this has not happened yet gives me the idea that the forum managers have a pretty good reason to not have done this already. I don't really care myself, I just switch to another tab while waiting and do something else.

[-Shifty-]

It's fine like how it is now, if you are writting good messages you don't need to wait all the times.

[MP2]

I do agree that people with high(er) posts/rep should have a reduced time. I'd be happy with 60 seconds. It's extremely frustrating and I'm extremely impatient.

[Jstylezzz]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ****** This was basically exactly what I was going to say. In a thread like this it takes nearly two minutes just to read through all the previous posts (something I'm not convinced many people do by the amount of duplication frequently seen). Then writing a reply like this takes another minute or so to think about what you want to say and type it out. For reference, this post is 757 characters, which even with a typing speed of 10 characters per second will take you 76 seconds to write. More than enough time between the wait periods to compose an in-depth reply (including proof-reading). Consider it incentive to that end. And yes, I had to keep adjusting the numbers every time I adjusted the text, which added on even more time to this reply.

I like how detailed and flavoured with a little complexity your posts are most of the times :3

[HyDrAtIc]

Quote:

Originally Posted by ****** This was basically exactly what I was going to say. In a thread like this it takes nearly two minutes just to read through all the previous posts (something I'm not convinced many people do by the amount of duplication frequently seen). Then writing a reply like this takes another minute or so to think about what you want to say and type it out. For reference, this post is 757 characters, which even with a typing speed of 10 characters per second will take you 76 seconds to write. More than enough time between the wait periods to compose an in-depth reply (including proof-reading). Consider it incentive to that end. And yes, I had to keep adjusting the numbers every time I adjusted the text, which added on even more time to this reply.

But what about people who reads fastly?

and I say MP2's idea is very good, you can just punish spammers, that's a very good idea, I hope you agree Y Less.

[Potassium]

Quote:

Originally Posted by MP2 I do agree that people with high(er) posts/rep should have a reduced time. I'd be happy with 60 seconds. It's extremely frustrating and I'm extremely impatient.

This.