[[WF]Demon]

There are other options of which should not be released into the public.

[Retardedwolf]

Quote:

Originally Posted by [WF]Demon There are other options of which should not be released into the public.

If you're talking about the hidden function, it is very inaccurate and useless.

[Snipa]

This will replace my /rban. The only way they can evade THIS is using proxies.

[pagie1111]

What is the "Hidden" function? 0_o

[Miguel]

The function to get some kind of serial from the player client.

[Voldemort]

This is something good, as I understand with hostname ban you meant, for example like, instead of ban my IP you would ban exaple my.internet.provider.name, if I understand it right?

[[WF]Demon]

Yes that is true. I'm going to be uploading a upgraded script soon.

[BizzyD]

I dont understand. What do you mean by hostname ?

[sekol]

Umm.. For example a cheater is using "NoobNet", if you will use hostname ban, it will ban everyone using NoobNet. The problem is with one use you can ban alot of players.

[Ivan_Pantovic]

Its not right to ban someone just because he has the same hostname as some cheater or something. Its better to use range IP ban for this stuff.

[Paul.eboy]

oh, really needed that
thanks

[Teprey]

Is'nt this in fact actually same thing as a range ban or plain single IP ban. As far as I know reverse DNS of IP address is always the same (127.0.0.1 may resolve to something like 127-0-0-1-isp.net or just isp.net) so you can simply ban IP of player or use range ban.

[sim_sima]

So this will ban hostnames? Like "x1-6-00-16-b6-3a-ec-ca.k80.webspeed.dk"??
Will all people with the same ISP get banned, or is it only the hostname in the specific player's house?

[Aoi_Rikuto]

It's eveyone on that ISP. Which is honestly very useless. Range ban is much more useful than banning a whole ISP.