10.12.2009, 09:35
I'd like to see the co-operation between parts as you find on a mac. And the quickness it brings with it.
Originally Posted by CJ101
Actually now that i think about it, Vista was shit.. So we want a OS thats not like that. Personally i dont know why they bothered with 7. Now we have windows 8? Obviously they want to make money, but MS just needs to get it right.. I mean linux cant even get viruses.
|
Originally Posted by CJ101
Actually now that i think about it, Vista was shit.. So we want a OS thats not like that. Personally i dont know why they bothered with 7. Now we have windows 8? Obviously they want to make money, but MS just needs to get it right.. I mean linux cant even get viruses.
|
Originally Posted by Malice
A 2010 version of Windows XP.
|
Originally Posted by Killerkid.
It's like Rockstar Games should keep 2D graphics because your Windows 95 PC can't handle GTA3.
|
Originally Posted by Seif_
Isn't 7 faster than XP? If not I'll just stick with XP.
|
Originally Posted by Malice
What exactly have they changed in Windows 7?
|
Originally Posted by Malice
It has the most support of any OS
|
Originally Posted by Kylla
[...]
|
Originally Posted by Donny
I'd like to see a package manager type of thing like we get on Ubuntu (this).
You know like when we type "appwizz.cpl" in the run prompt to get add/remove, well we would type I dunno like "package.cpl" and get the list of all packages, it's info, how many installed and all that. People could submit packages to some kind of MS database for verification and then it goes onto the official list (in our app) so we can download and install it. |
Originally Posted by Killerkid.
Quote:
The reason Windows has so many viruses is because the virus makers target the OS with the most market share. |
But what I want for Windows 8 is automatic error handling. When something crashes, for example due to a missing DLL file, Windows will automatically go out and download that file. Also, the footprint Windows makes is HUGE and needs to be shrunk. When Win95 first came out, it could have an installation less than 30MB. With Windows 7, you can barely have an installation less than 15GB, so a lot of the depreciated clutter needs to be removed. |
Windows 8 to be 128-bit compatible? |
Originally Posted by HydraX
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kevin Fallow / KevKo
For whatever reason, I highly doubt that your uncle works on the Windows Dev team. Just saying.
|