Quote:
Originally Posted by IstuntmanI
Code used:
pawn Код:
public OnFilterScriptInit( )
{
new liTick;
#define ITERS 1000000
//============================[ Set Int ]===================================
// GVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
SetGVarInt( "TestSI", 69 );
printf( "INT: Set: GVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
// SVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
SetSVarInt( "TestSI", 69 );
printf( "INT: Set: SVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
//============================[ Get Int ]===================================
// GVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
GetGVarInt( "TestGI" );
printf( "INT: Get: GVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
// SVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
GetSVarInt( "TestGI" );
printf( "INT: Get: SVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
//===========================[ Set Float ]==================================
// GVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
SetGVarFloat( "TestSF", 69.00 );
printf( "FLOAT: Set: GVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
// SVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
SetSVarFloat( "TestSF", 69.00 );
printf( "FLOAT: Set: SVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
//===========================[ Get Float ]==================================
// GVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
GetGVarFloat( "TestGF" );
printf( "FLOAT: Get: GVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
// SVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
GetSVarFloat( "TestGF" );
printf( "FLOAT: Get: SVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
//===========================[ Set String ]=================================
// GVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
SetGVarString( "TestSS", "Sixty Nine" );
printf( "STRING: Set: GVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
// SVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
SetSVarString( "TestSS", "Sixty Nine" );
printf( "STRING: Set: SVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
//===========================[ Get String ]=================================
new lsString[ 16 ];
// GVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
GetGVarString( "TestGS", lsString, 16 );
printf( "STRING: Get: GVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
// SVar
liTick = GetTickCount( );
for( new i = 0; i < ITERS; i ++ )
GetSVarString( "TestGS", lsString, 16 );
printf( "STRING: Get: SVar speed for %d iterations: %dms", ITERS, GetTickCount( ) - liTick );
return 1;
}
Results:
So SVars are slower only at setting strings. |
That's not entirely accurate. You're only allocating one element each time. I've only tested integers, but here's what I got by allocating 100,000 unique elements:
pawn Код:
new names[100000][16];
for (new i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
format(names[i], sizeof(names[]), "name_%d", i);
}
pawn Код:
new time = GetTickCount();
for (new i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
SetGVarInt(names[i], i);
}
printf("Time #1: %d", GetTickCount() - time);
time = GetTickCount();
for (new i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
GetGVarInt(names[i]);
}
printf("Time #2: %d", GetTickCount() - time);
Код:
[19:03:10] Time #1: 54
[19:03:10] Time #2: 35
pawn Код:
new time = GetTickCount();
for (new i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
SetSVarInt(names[i], i);
}
printf("Time #1: %d", GetTickCount() - time);
time = GetTickCount();
for (new i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
GetSVarInt(names[i], i);
}
printf("Time #2: %d", GetTickCount() - time);
Код:
[19:04:05] Time #1: 1089
[19:04:06] Time #2: 1004
SVars are big improvement over properties, but they still seem to be slightly slower than GVars as they increase in number. I assume a hash table implementation wasn't used.
As for your suggestion: yes, I suppose that could be done pretty easily. JernejL also suggested iteration support to me a while back, but I haven't found the time to see about adding it yet.
