[FilterScript] Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method]
#17

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaprnks
View Post
If you have anything to say that is unrelated to "Thanks, suggestions, or bugs" please do not post.

Efficiency
-Editing from settings without pawno knowledge makes it efficient at customization.
-Utilizing ForEach instead of traditional for() is efficient use.
-Using defines rather than variables to make only the necessary code compile is efficiency in resources.
-Allowing the user to tell the server they are still in-game so they won't get kicked efficiently removed the possibility of falsely kicked users.
-Checking every defined value instead of every 15 minutes (concept from godfather) is more efficient detection.



Excuse me?
Well, instead of saying its more efficient, you should say its more optimal. I didn't curse at you, I was basically inputting there that the last sentence I created was to go towards you, don't worry.

Quote:

If you have anything to say that is unrelated to "Thanks, suggestions, or bugs" please do not post.

So, you only want positive comments? How do questions sound, I asked a question and gave my opinion, you don't make the topic rules.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Efficient anti-AFK - FIXED - by Chaprnks - 19.07.2010, 06:20
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by ev0lution - 19.07.2010, 06:38
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Chaprnks - 19.07.2010, 06:45
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by ev0lution - 19.07.2010, 07:25
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Chaprnks - 19.07.2010, 08:08
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by MWF2 - 19.07.2010, 14:16
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by StreetGT - 19.07.2010, 15:49
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Julian2574 - 19.07.2010, 18:19
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by nuriel8833 - 19.07.2010, 19:45
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Chaprnks - 20.07.2010, 00:46
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Silent314 - 20.07.2010, 00:52
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Scenario - 20.07.2010, 01:26
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Chaprnks - 20.07.2010, 01:34
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by cessil - 20.07.2010, 03:10
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Scenario - 20.07.2010, 04:02
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Chaprnks - 20.07.2010, 04:43
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by Scenario - 20.07.2010, 06:23
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by cessil - 20.07.2010, 06:33
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by External-Life - 22.07.2010, 12:15
Re: Efficient anti-AFK [not the usual method] - by [NWD]Tweener_ - 19.08.2010, 22:12

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)