25.09.2009, 21:39
Are you serious, iTunes better than winamp, Winblows Media better than either?!?! DO YOU SMOKE CRACK?
Serious question.
Now, let me show you how to figure out how something is truly better than something else.
1. Look at the features.
2. Look at performance cost (what it takes to run)
Then you will would realize why Winamp has been the number one media player since the early 90's.
@ the guy that said if winamp had a decent skin you would use it, throw your pc in the trash. Style should have nothing to do stopping you from using the most feature rich and low cost (performance wise) media player, also I suppose you have looked threw all of the thousands of skins right
Sorry but people that claim iTunes should even be compared to Winamp need to learn more about a pc, there is no reason why iTunes having less features should take up 3x the amount of ram as Winamp.
Serious question.
Now, let me show you how to figure out how something is truly better than something else.
1. Look at the features.
2. Look at performance cost (what it takes to run)
Then you will would realize why Winamp has been the number one media player since the early 90's.
@ the guy that said if winamp had a decent skin you would use it, throw your pc in the trash. Style should have nothing to do stopping you from using the most feature rich and low cost (performance wise) media player, also I suppose you have looked threw all of the thousands of skins right
Sorry but people that claim iTunes should even be compared to Winamp need to learn more about a pc, there is no reason why iTunes having less features should take up 3x the amount of ram as Winamp.