[Mandrack_FreeZe]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infin1ty ill experiment with this when i've got free time. why not go with a more user-friendly function naming scheme? PG_function doesn't really sound appealing to me. how about pgsql_function? or sql_function? i know defines can easily be written for this but that defeats the purpose of keeping your plugins up to date as functions and natives are constantly being added.

I will think about changing the names of the functions in the future, per hour I will focus on issues such as memory manipulation and performance.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mellnik That's nice but why would you use that instead of MySQL?

Good night Mellnik, it depends on the user, I for example prefer to use PostgreSQL instead of MySQL. This plugin gives you the chance to work with this DBMS in your projects. If you want more reasons, look for the difference between the PostgreSQL DBMS and MySQL.