[Sasino97]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y_Less Again, not really. Unless you know how the words are related. And it is still VASTLY better than normal passwords where people do use the same ones over and over, and those common passwords are very well known and documented. The theoretical difficulty in cracking normal passwords assumes that “Df3()AsЈ” is just as common as “p4ssw0RD”. Do you think that’s the case? You’re arguing that this method is less secure because it has a theoretical attack, while totally ignoring the fact that the current method has a known attack. Edit: Why? Yes, passwords with semantic meaning are slightly worse, but still vastly better than most normal passwords. Again: You’re arguing that this method is less secure because it has a theoretical attack, while totally ignoring the fact that the current method has a known attack. Is it perfect? No. Is it better than the alternative (when a password manager isn't available? Yes!

Sorry for my bad choice of words, I was not arguing that it is less secure than the common method, I was just trying to say that it is not the safest, for example a string like "1o3junr4eounjjaaa420asdmf21mno21r90sd9Lmjsaf2104k SPADPjfesoafa90sa90dfas" would be at the same time long enough to destroy any brute-force attack, random enough not to appear in any dictionary, but the downside is that it is almost impossible to memorize, and painful to type every time. When we have a password manager, then it is not a problem, but since for SA-MP it is not possible to implement it, then it is much better to use the correct horse method than using "p4$$word".