[JesterlJoker]

Quote:

Originally Posted by iKarim Err... No. INI was meant to be a configuration storage, not a database solution. If you can't/won't learn SQL for some reason, there's NoSQL but I doubt there's a PAWN library for that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INI_file https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL

Yeah I know that, I just answered his question since, DINI and Y_INI sports saving configurations, both had held up as saving systems too...

INI might be for configuration system, but it can come in handy as a simple File Handler for uncomplicated systems. INI can also be used to learn the small details of File Handling before diving towards the depths of Tartarus just to get a hand in what mostly MySQL is doing... Some simply cannot understand MySQL without having a little understanding on how to manipulate data and INI saving systems can give you a little round up to do manipulation... With few twists and turns one can also create a simple, small database system with it...

Benchmarks, although shows no promising leads on a good future using INI file system with data manipulation but at least learning the ropes made MySQL a better water to dive in.

Then again a simple File System ignoring redundant data and comparing it to a Database System with redundant data shows File System handles it almost as better as Database System.