[Pghpunkid]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pottus I would expect more from someone around so long this project has absolutely zero viability.

Pottus, everyone said the same things to me when I started ScriptPlayer. Woet even threatened to ban me from IRC for making a proof of concept using a IRC channel for basic text messages, because I was 17 and didn't have money for a VPS.

Are there security concerns? Definitely. Not viable? Come on...

Код:

vi·a·ble
ˈvīəb(ə)l/
adjective
capable of working successfully; feasible.

Ye have little faith. Whats wrong with saying 'you could try it'? Let him find out the restrictions. There was that SAMP UI project a ways back. That was viable, so why not this?

This is why I am not the most active person here.. its always judging the fish by its ability to climb a tree.
/rant

As far as security concerns go OP, you have a rather large battle ahead of you on that. If you could enforce things like runtime HTML/CSS generation and modification for things like speedometers and what not, and not allow linking to actual websites, I think you'll strike gold. But the security starts and ends with you. If you allow server operators to use your code as a vehicle for malicious or grossly explicit (or illegal) content distribution, you could face some serious community consequences, or at minimum your project being 'blacklisted'. Kind of like memory hacking plugins have been.

--

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crystallize lmao Kalcor is the only developer he confirmed it multiple times.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SickAttack At the moment, yes. Before, no.

Ahh, okay well nevermind then.