[CantBeJohn]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yashas Test code for SickAttack's include: http://pastebin.com/EJR7y49A Results: SmartCMD test code: http://pastebin.com/ZWxA6p6a Results: [14:57:48] 933 [14:57:49] 939 [14:57:50] 951 [14:57:51] 942 [14:57:52] 923 [14:57:53] 954 [14:57:54] 928 [14:57:55] 912 [14:57:55] 907 [14:57:56] 915 [14:57:56] Average: 930.40 Interesting, this include without dirty bloated code is faster than SickAttack's include. Moreover, I haven't added any performance improvement code to the callbacks so in principle SmartCMD is more faster than the timings shown in this test.

Nice, not sure if I was clear enough in my other post but I was going to switch over to this regardless if SickAttack's was faster or not. This just looks really nice and I see some useful stuff I can use.