23.10.2016, 11:13
I dont think this is better than PAWN.Cmd. I don't believe those speed test results. PAWN.Cmd just can't be slower than any PAWN include. In fact, if you do the same function calls in PAWN code, it will still take less time that PAWN.Cmd takes (the time it took in the speed test). So it is simply unbelievable.


