11.10.2016, 07:09
If amx files were compiled executables (exe, dll), then your argument would be wrong as the speed of the logical operations depends on the CPU.
I am not sure how things work for PAWN. You are probably right because the AMX machine has a lot of work (decoding the instruction) to do just before doing the actual CPU > or != instruction so the CPU implementation shouldn't really contribute. PAWN will always be very slow.
I am not sure how things work for PAWN. You are probably right because the AMX machine has a lot of work (decoding the instruction) to do just before doing the actual CPU > or != instruction so the CPU implementation shouldn't really contribute. PAWN will always be very slow.