[Crystallize]

Quote:

Originally Posted by SickAttack I updated the include once again, here are the new benchmarks: Код: This Include: 841 This Include: 848 This Include: 843 This Include: 846 This Include: 850 I did benchmarks between this include and Pawn.CMD, and these are the results: Код: This Include: 853 | 10/10/2016 This Include: 848 | 10/10/2016 This Include: 852 | 10/10/2016 This Include: 850 | 10/10/2016 This Include: 851 | 10/10/2016 Pawn.CMD: 1,446 | 10/10/2016 Pawn.CMD: 1,451 | 10/10/2016 Pawn.CMD: 1,460 | 10/10/2016 Pawn.CMD: 1,455 | 10/10/2016 Pawn.CMD: 1,449 | 10/10/2016 Check out the main post for the code used to benchmark both. This include seems to be considerably faster! Could anyone confirm this? P.S. I didn't benchmark this include with Pawn.CMD before as PC_EmulateCommand wasn't executing commands for me, but then I noticed it only executes if a player is connected to the server (thanks to Stinged's code). Based on those results, I doubt Pawn.CMD is any faster than I-ZCMD. I don't know or have seen a single person define commands like that before, so I guess it's more than okay. Not to mention tolower is vastly slow, and 0x60 doesn't do anything. Thanks, by the way!

I don't think an include is faster than a plugin dude that's impossible.