[IstuntmanI]

Quote:

Originally Posted by vannesenn When I replace cache_get_row_int with cache_get_value_index_int, I get warning that number of parameters doesn't match definition. Here's my code Code: _dan = cache_get_row_int(0, 0) + 1; becomes Code: _dan = cache_get_value_index_int(0, 0) + 1; I like new plugin, and major changes, but you fucked up little bit with changing functions names.

Quote:

all cache_get_ functions now return their value through a reference parameter instead of returning it directly

So you have to do it like this:

Code:

cache_get_value_index_int(0, 0, _dan);
_dan += 1;

I think that he made a bad decision for getting a column's value through a reference parameter. I get his idea of making every function return a status value, but still.

One important downside: we have to transform all our lines using SetGVar* or SetPVar* to use a temporary variable, which I don't like to.