Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP
#6

The implementation of Whirlpool in the plugin outputs the result in uppercase and as such it is probably already stored in uppercase in the database. The PHP implementation of Whirlpool outputs the result in lowercase so that result needs to be made uppercase to be matched against what is already stored.

tl;dr: only the PHP output needs to be made uppercase.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by TheBigFive - 05.08.2016, 11:30
Re: Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by Vince - 05.08.2016, 11:51
Re: Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by TheBigFive - 05.08.2016, 11:57
Re: Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by Vince - 05.08.2016, 13:26
Re: Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by TheBigFive - 05.08.2016, 13:28
Re: Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by Vince - 05.08.2016, 13:39
Re: Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by TheBigFive - 05.08.2016, 13:47
Re: Whirlpool hashing in pawn compared to PHP - by SickAttack - 05.08.2016, 14:19

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)