[PrO.GameR]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince With all due respect, but that's rubbish. You're actually typing more than what actually get replaced, completely defeating the purpose of a macro. The ternary operator is universal and anyone's who's familiar with will instantly recognize it.

I agree with it being rubbish of a macro but I kinda have a bunch of ternary in ternaries (kinda like a little switch, but can't use switch because of it can only compare a value to a constant) And it looks fucked up just because of the string problem I mentioned, Absolutely if it could be used like sth>sth1 ? "Yes" : sth==sth2 ? "No" : "Maybe"
sure I wouldn't need that but with a shitload of brackets needed to make that work for this compiler thats a no-go, let alone a 4th option (Just for example, I don't really use that many at least for strings but I still use double ternary occasionally.)

But I guess it's just a preference tho, I can follow everything but braces(? brackets? we call them parentheses) so ternary operators with brackets are actually a nightmare for me.