[Include] mBits - better than Booleans
#5

Quote:

Is it really worth saving few kilobytes of memory at the cost of performance?

PAWN scripts should have few kilobytes. SAMP gamemodes very straining PAWN. But yes, stocks = extra calls and timings.
Tomorrow I will add an alternative version with defines.

Maybe in the future i will make more functions like few integers in one var (eg. usage for pickups IDs - array size 2000 instead of 4000)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
mBits - better than Booleans - by MakuPL - 04.02.2016, 17:01
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by Yashas - 04.02.2016, 17:08
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by Pottus - 04.02.2016, 17:13
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by Slice - 04.02.2016, 17:45
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by MakuPL - 04.02.2016, 19:01
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by TakeiT - 04.02.2016, 20:50
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by Alcatrik - 04.02.2016, 20:52
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by Macluawn - 04.02.2016, 21:11
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by AbyssMorgan - 05.02.2016, 05:52
Re: mBits - better than Booleans - by MakuPL - 05.02.2016, 13:42

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)