[Rancho]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kebab- Is that the only reason why you choose to write in C++, because PAWN is "plain"? I personally don't see PAWN as "plain", but very restricting in certain circumstances. There's more packages, tutorials and guides out there for other languages, as PAWN is not popular at all, in comparison with other languages. I hate the structure it uses (top-down design), I prefer object orientated programming. I also feel as if it's hard to organise the code well.

I meant what you've said, also there is no point to learn Pawn and write in it. It has no future. Totally time waste I think.