[[WSF]ThA_Devil]

Quote:

Originally Posted by V1ceC1ty You can't get better because Intel don't make anything that bad anymore

Yea, you can just pay twice as much to get the same

Reply to Mauzen -
According* to Passmark CPU bench marks
I5-3570k is actually worse than 8320. Oh yea, there's 2 versions of 8320 - 8320 and 8320E ( 95W, lower performance).

Still 8320 should suffice for everything he wants to do.

And what if he has already made AM3(+) platform and is upgrading a cpu. Does it pay off for throwing out rest of components just to get an Intel CPU? Well it does not.

And to Mauzen - If you think that FX-8320 is not enough for gaming, then you must be rocking Intel Xeon E5-2697 with 4 way Titan Z SLI and playing with at least 4k in 3 monitor eyefinity.


I just hate these types of AMD vs Intel threads. Like seriously, It starts by somebody showing a specs of pc, and then the flame/spec wars start. I have nothing against Intel or AMD, they have their own strengths and weaknesses and when looking for a NEW CPU, Affordable price and the performance you get from the price is what matters. You could argue with that, but just look at the statistics, AMD FX-6300 is one of best price/performance CPU's.
Like seriously, BOTH just work fine for WHATEVER you try to do with it. Well if you try to play Battlefield 4 on AMD Athlon 64 it WILL NOT WORK, same goes for Pentium 4.