[RayW]

Quote:

Originally Posted by [Twixx] I play both BF3 and BF4 everyday, I'm a die-hard Battlefield fan. Although BF4 has improved since it's release, it's still terrible compared to BF3.

Different Battlefield games have their own differences, I'll admit, but I wouldn't go as far as calling BF4 "terrible" at all. How exactly is it terrible? At launch it could be called terrible with the horrible netcode and the crashes left and right (blame EA for that), but now? Not so much...

As far as different BF games having their own strengths

BFBC2: Rush was awesome, best sound design. Awesome Map design.
BF3: Rush was ruined, sound design degraded massively. Great map design. I hated the blue filter. Had some classic BF2 maps.
BF4: Rush and sound design same as BF3, Great map design, no blue filter, but they added Carrier Assault (aka Titan Mode) from BF2142 which is awesome.

See what I'm getting at? Every BF has their own strengths and weaknesses. Overall I think BC2 was my favorite BF game, but I would kill to see some BC2 Rush with Back to Karkand in BF4.