[Include] h_Cmd | Command processor
#10

Quote:
Originally Posted by PT
Посмотреть сообщение
Using sscanf and y_cmd its much faster than use this

Anyway nice work.
It's faster that way but in his defense it's pointless to even measure command processing speed because you'll never have more than a few commands per second even on a large server speed measurements don't even come close to real world practice.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
h_Cmd | Command processor - by Mr.Hardy - 04.04.2014, 17:31
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by UnknownOwner - 04.04.2014, 17:36
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by FailerZ - 04.04.2014, 17:42
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by iZN - 04.04.2014, 17:54
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Mr.Hardy - 04.04.2014, 18:19
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Pottus - 04.04.2014, 22:31
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Mr.Hardy - 04.04.2014, 22:43
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Niko_boy - 05.04.2014, 04:35
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by PT - 05.04.2014, 10:16
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Pottus - 05.04.2014, 13:47

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)