[Include] h_Cmd | Command processor
#5

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnknownOwner
Посмотреть сообщение
Nice. Hope to see more releases from you.
Going to test it and report you any bug, if found.
Thank you, but there are other releases in the Portuguese area will translate soon

Quote:
Originally Posted by FailerZ
Посмотреть сообщение
Nice, I will test it
Thanks "bro"

Quote:
Originally Posted by iZN
Посмотреть сообщение
Mind doing some test with ZCMD and y_cmds? Also, using split function is very slow as compared to sscanf, try to use sscanf and see the results.
Its introduction has already warned that the use is not required .. I'm still optimizing is more include any claim of bug is acceptable at this time ...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
h_Cmd | Command processor - by Mr.Hardy - 04.04.2014, 17:31
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by UnknownOwner - 04.04.2014, 17:36
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by FailerZ - 04.04.2014, 17:42
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by iZN - 04.04.2014, 17:54
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Mr.Hardy - 04.04.2014, 18:19
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Pottus - 04.04.2014, 22:31
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Mr.Hardy - 04.04.2014, 22:43
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Niko_boy - 05.04.2014, 04:35
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by PT - 05.04.2014, 10:16
Re: h_Cmd | Command processor - by Pottus - 05.04.2014, 13:47

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)