TRIANGLE.GS, SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM [UPDATED]

Linear Mode

TRIANGLE.GS, SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM [UPDATED]

Sublime
High-roller

Posts: 1,003
Threads: 31
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 0

#24

04.11.2013, 11:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kikito

View Post

The one which we can trust on his sa-mp.gs.
Want to know why?
Because it is run by woot, which had, in the past, run samp4free.

The design of the website isn't bad.
The grammar errors there are 0[I didn't found any].
And there is no "kids" controlling it.

Ultra host or whatever is it called, No.
Wanna know why? SQL Injection vulnerabilities, kids controlling it, and a freaking ugly website design.

pff however the grammar or the website may be, the user is still getting his free server? However may twisted the ToS can be, the applier still gets his server! Now just because sa-mp.gs is lookin' cool, would you apply there? What if, there are no ports over sa-mp.gs (3 locations) and you are forced to use Ultra-H? If I get my product with good condition however it comes by, I just don't give a fuck.

*And how do you know Ultra-H's owner is a kid?

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

TRIANGLE.GS, SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM [UPDATED] - by LeeXian99 - 04.11.2013, 03:24

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by carz0159 - 04.11.2013, 03:47

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by XProtocol - 04.11.2013, 03:49

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Sublime - 04.11.2013, 03:53

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Tuntun - 04.11.2013, 03:57

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by carz0159 - 04.11.2013, 04:02

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Tuntun - 04.11.2013, 05:04

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by LeeXian99 - 04.11.2013, 05:04

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Tuntun - 04.11.2013, 05:14

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Uberanwar - 04.11.2013, 05:19

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Sublime - 04.11.2013, 05:26

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by ViruZz - 04.11.2013, 05:31

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by LeeXian99 - 04.11.2013, 05:36

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by [FSaF]Jarno - 04.11.2013, 05:40

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by JohnD123 - 04.11.2013, 06:34

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by DanishHaq - 04.11.2013, 07:08

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by iZN - 04.11.2013, 07:15

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by ca2k - 04.11.2013, 08:15

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Neonman - 04.11.2013, 08:22

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by RanSEE - 04.11.2013, 09:07

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by khanz - 04.11.2013, 09:32

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Kikito - 04.11.2013, 10:49

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by LeeXian99 - 04.11.2013, 10:55

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Sublime - 04.11.2013, 11:11

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Kikito - 04.11.2013, 11:18

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Aldo. - 08.02.2014, 15:06

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by justsomeguy - 08.02.2014, 15:28

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by carz0159 - 08.02.2014, 17:28

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Potassium - 08.02.2014, 19:06

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Alexia_Vitella - 09.02.2014, 01:58

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Sgt.TheDarkness - 09.02.2014, 09:48

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by saiberfun - 09.02.2014, 10:27

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Sgt.TheDarkness - 09.02.2014, 11:11

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by ic3cr3am - 09.02.2014, 11:50

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by Neonman - 09.02.2014, 12:10

Re: SA-MP.GS vs ULTRA-H.COM (No offense) - by park4bmx - 09.02.2014, 22:14

View a Printable Version

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)