09.07.2013, 14:14
No, sorry, it will never get past the first enter command's return... UNLESS you:
1. Don't have a return at the end of the first enter command.
2. Have a return at the end of the second enter command.
3. Have the second enter command directly after the first one.
However, in which case it would be neater just to have it as one command. More or less because it would be reading both enter commands, starting with the first one.
1. Don't have a return at the end of the first enter command.
2. Have a return at the end of the second enter command.
3. Have the second enter command directly after the first one.
However, in which case it would be neater just to have it as one command. More or less because it would be reading both enter commands, starting with the first one.