samp "revolution"
#6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandiel
View Post
I agree with everything, if the SAMP developement team can infact add a map editor as a part of SAMP, hats off.
Maybe not a real map editor (as it would be time consuming; JernejL already created a great one), but some debug functions (like /dl) to let us place objects in debug mode.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RealCop228
View Post
I agree with the majority of these ideas. However, wouldn't updating to PAWN 4.0 be better than 3.3.4127? Even if it breaks scripts, I'm sure it would be better for everyone in the long run.

Why not make it so we don't need a streamer to have an "unlimited" amount of objects? Why not just have inbuilt object streaming on the SA:MP server/client?

I would personally prefer just having CreateVehicle instead of AddStaticVehicle because I don't use static vehicles in my servers whatsoever. So, just having CreateVehicle would be better.
Yes, in the long run Pawn 4.0 would certainly be better, but I've seen Kalcor's post and made me think that Pawn 3.3.4127 would be a better choice (for now). (btw, it will break plugins aswell)

That was pretty much my point.

I really don't care wether it is CreateVehicle or AddStaticVehicle, it was just an idea. This is why I posted these suggestions here, I wanted your opinion! Actually, CreateVehicle sounds better (and it fits the naming convetions: CreateTextDraw, CreatePickup, CreateObject, etc.)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
samp "revolution" - by Dan.. - 21.06.2013, 19:42
Re: samp "revolution" - by Macluawn - 21.06.2013, 20:40
Re: samp "revolution" - by Dan.. - 21.06.2013, 20:44
Re: samp "revolution" - by Sandiel - 21.06.2013, 20:51
Re: samp "revolution" - by Scenario - 21.06.2013, 20:52
Re: samp "revolution" - by Dan.. - 21.06.2013, 20:53
Re: samp "revolution" - by MP2 - 21.06.2013, 21:33
Re: samp "revolution" - by steki. - 21.06.2013, 21:48
Re: samp "revolution" - by AndreT - 21.06.2013, 22:40
Re: samp "revolution" - by shitbird - 21.06.2013, 23:21
Re: samp "revolution" - by Macluawn - 22.06.2013, 00:25
Re: samp "revolution" - by Y_Less - 22.06.2013, 00:58
Re: samp "revolution" - by Kar - 22.06.2013, 02:01
Re: samp "revolution" - by Dan.. - 22.06.2013, 07:07
Re: samp "revolution" - by zgintasz - 22.06.2013, 07:11
Re: samp "revolution" - by Dan.. - 22.06.2013, 08:28
Re: samp "revolution" - by MP2 - 22.06.2013, 09:43
Re: samp "revolution" - by Y_Less - 22.06.2013, 11:00
Re: samp "revolution" - by xeeZ - 22.06.2013, 11:59
Re: samp "revolution" - by Dan.. - 22.06.2013, 12:01
Re: samp "revolution" - by zgintasz - 22.06.2013, 12:21
AW: samp "revolution" - by Mellnik - 30.06.2013, 19:24
Re: samp "revolution" - by Kar - 30.06.2013, 21:29
Re: samp "revolution" - by Steven82 - 01.07.2013, 02:11
Re: samp "revolution" - by [ABK]Antonio - 01.07.2013, 03:23
Re: samp "revolution" - by Kar - 01.07.2013, 15:53
Re: samp "revolution" - by Steven82 - 01.07.2013, 20:01
Respuesta: samp "revolution" - by Gryphus One - 04.07.2013, 16:41
Re: samp "revolution" - by Y_Less - 04.07.2013, 16:57
Respuesta: Re: samp "revolution" - by Gryphus One - 04.07.2013, 17:30
Re: samp "revolution" - by AndreT - 04.07.2013, 18:07
Respuesta: Re: samp "revolution" - by Gryphus One - 04.07.2013, 18:14
Re: Respuesta: Re: samp "revolution" - by Basssiiie - 04.07.2013, 19:44
Re: samp "revolution" - by zgintasz - 04.07.2013, 21:39
Re: samp "revolution" - by zgintasz - 05.07.2013, 05:13
Re: samp "revolution" - by Dan.. - 05.07.2013, 07:51
AW: Re: samp "revolution" - by maddinat0r - 05.07.2013, 11:58

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)