SSCANF multiple optionals.. Not processing.. Why?
#2

I actually read about it yesterday (the "e" specifier) as I was scouring your documentation and have since started making the switch, however I thought I read it wasn't compatible with multi-dimensional arrays. I'll review the documentation and if I'm wrong, so many headaches have been relieved.

. Thanks for this, I didn't realize that the SQL result "NULL" was actually being read by PAWN as a string. Stupid mistake, definitely should have thought of it myself!

Thanks so much ******.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
SSCANF multiple optionals.. Not processing.. Why? - by TheStreetsRP - 25.05.2013, 18:53
Re: SSCANF multiple optionals.. Not processing.. Why? - by TheStreetsRP - 26.05.2013, 18:33
Re: SSCANF multiple optionals.. Not processing.. Why? - by TheStreetsRP - 26.05.2013, 18:59

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)