[SchurmanCQC]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie` I'm not bullshitting here, and my job was quite simple and futile - create an interface from a great and fast xml parser to a scripting language with no object orientation support. I'm talking about software interface layering, and not the best algorithm. Or you dare to tell me a pawn script, which is executed by opcodes and native amx functions, passing through dozens of instructions is faster than C++ code compiled to native instructions? See a nice speed test: Add a little abstract machine overhead and there you go. And about this one: Watch your interpretation: I meant if you're looking for a xml parser and that's it, that's it. I have enough respect for Y_Less and I bet he is alright for what has been said here. Let's keep the argument straight and not turn my topic into a flame war.

Thanks for this.

Can you post the code you used to test this so I can run the test myself?