[steki.]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schurman What are you trying to prove here? Your XML plugin is superior? Y_Less spent hundreds, if not, thousands of hours coding YSI. And you don't even know what it is? YSI is dozens of libraries going up and beyond XML... pfft. ****** it, and try using it. Why should I believe you? You're all full of yourself and stuck-up. You have no respect for YSI or its creator, do you? Please, for the sake of my sanity: PROVE IT

I'm not bullshitting here, and my job was quite simple and futile - create an interface from a great and fast xml parser to a scripting language with no object orientation support. I'm talking about software interface layering, and not the best algorithm. Or you dare to tell me a pawn script, which is executed by opcodes and native amx functions, passing through dozens of instructions is faster than C++ code compiled to native instructions?

See a nice speed test:


Add a little abstract machine overhead and there you go.

And about this one:

Quote:

There's no need for YSI if you're using this plugin.

Watch your interpretation: I meant if you're looking for a xml parser and that's it, that's it.

I have enough respect for Y_Less and I bet he is alright for what has been said here.
Let's keep the argument straight and not turn my topic into a flame war.