08.03.2013, 10:18
Quote:
klklt0: Have you actually read the source of this plugin at all? Or the source of the PAWN BVM (which is open-source)? If not, then I'd support the claim of "lack of knowledge" and add that you have an "abundance of speculation" - not the same thing at all.
|
And the disadvantage was more considerated for the plugins on overall, and not for this plugin himself.
The little difference of this plugin to others is that it doesn't uses a .pwn script, but it still keeps getting called by the sa-mp server, the delay can exists or not, of course it depends on the code the function have, the calcules the server have to do, and so on, like you said.
But for other plugins, it is a bit slower because the Server needs to request to the PAWN SCRIPT which will request to the SERVER to execute the function X, which after executed will return the data to the SERVER, which will return to the PAWN function.
Since i don't know the sa-mp server architecture i can't neither say too much about it, nor how it does work internally.
So, since then it will have a little delay on the execution[even't if we don't notice it, there is a little delay].
It's like
Calls the function | executes the function | return the data
Server -> Pawn -> Server -> Plugin -> Server -> Pawn.
Quote:
By the way, serveral of your points were dangerously close to attacking the poster not the post - that is flaming and expressly against forum rules, debates are not.
|
@Stewie`
Are you perfect?
Because i'm not.
Failing and doing errors is a natural, no one is perfect, everyone fails, everyone do errors, and the most important, everyone learn with their errors.