03.01.2013, 20:10
I have at least 2 GB of RAM on my server, about 1 GB free.
You don't need like a gigabyte of RAM to compile a couple thousand
lines of code, therefore that should be totally sufficient.
I assume so because I can easily compile stuff like the Linux Kernel
on that machine, which has millions of lines of code. In my opinion
it's rather a bug of the PAWN compiler, of simply a misconfiguration.
I'm running Linux, so I do not use the PAWN compiler coming with
SAMP, but as you can see I use exactly the same version, but
compiled by myself. I run it like this:
In the .ini file, that comes with Pawno there additionally are the
parameters "-r -w 203", which however do not change the
results, and are pretty useless in my opinion.
Maybe there are some people watching this thread, who know whether
the SAMP team applied any changes to the PAWN compiler, that
they ship with the Windows server release.
You don't need like a gigabyte of RAM to compile a couple thousand
lines of code, therefore that should be totally sufficient.
I assume so because I can easily compile stuff like the Linux Kernel
on that machine, which has millions of lines of code. In my opinion
it's rather a bug of the PAWN compiler, of simply a misconfiguration.
I'm running Linux, so I do not use the PAWN compiler coming with
SAMP, but as you can see I use exactly the same version, but
compiled by myself. I run it like this:
Код:
pawncc -i/home/samp/pawn/include
parameters "-r -w 203", which however do not change the
results, and are pretty useless in my opinion.
Maybe there are some people watching this thread, who know whether
the SAMP team applied any changes to the PAWN compiler, that
they ship with the Windows server release.