11.07.2012, 06:25
I am usually a nice guy on these forums but you are pissing me off.
You came and dump this four month old tutorial thread with the below quote which is false.
Knowing that the quote above is false. I replied in total sarcasm which is quoted below.
Later you then replied again with the quote below.
From this point on I am thinking your a total idiot. First you said "Pawn is not programming". Now you are saying "Even the company it self said it was a programming language". Please note, you said "it was" and not "it is" which is poor phrasing and grammar on your part.
In my second reply to you. I quoted your first two replies on this thread showing your thoughtless post with a short jester by me.
Then you reply stating it was a typo on your part along with utter garage which I have not a clue what your talking about. You are saying I have no source to my statement but I never made a statement. Then you're saying my argument is invalid but I wasn't having an argument. All I might have stated is that pawn is a programming language. I know that for a fact but I can't know that for you.
Then you have the guts to call me special and you don't know one bit about me.
Here's two words 'Fuck off'
You came and dump this four month old tutorial thread with the below quote which is false.
Knowing that the quote above is false. I replied in total sarcasm which is quoted below.
Quote:
Thanks for dumping. *sarcasm*
I actually forgot all about this old tutorial I made. I feel I'll update it soon. Pawn isn't a programming language?, WELL, thats new to me. *sarcasm again* |
Quote:
Even the company it self said it was a programming language. Look up there Wiki.
|
In my second reply to you. I quoted your first two replies on this thread showing your thoughtless post with a short jester by me.
Quote:
First you dump this old thread by saying pawn is not a programming language. Then you reply again saying it was. Are you mentally challenge by way chance? Pawn is a programming language, that's all I will say to you.
|
Quote:
It was a typo, you don't have a source to your "Statement" therefor, your argument is invalid. As, I can provide source my self.
|
Here's two words 'Fuck off'