[Whiteagle]

Hello Guys!
Long time since I posted on the SA-MP boards...
I'm also glad to see that there are still people out there developing .NET wrappers.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikkentim I think .Net sa-mp coding will never be the-thing. Since sa-mp gm scripting is based on pawn, all plugins as based on pawn. It won't be possible to communicate between these plugins properly. Pawn is not that much different from .Net code(except vb, but who is grown-up and uses that?) Its just my opinion...

The main difference between Pawn and .NET is, for me, the OOP it allows.
For the ones who do not understand much of code (for the scripters out there) it's not a big thing.
Now for the real programmers out there used to Java, C# and other object oriented languages a functional, complete, stable and interoping natively .NET/Java library would be the cherry on top of SA-MP.

First it lets you organize, think and make your code in a completely different way, then the development time is so much faster!

It's damn awesome, when you know how to use the force it gives you (you must use the force).

But if you dont know how to use it.... well....

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoaPsyFactor In programming everything is possible , just create worker that will communicate with plugins, especially with them, cuz plugins are written in c++, only thing is, that all inc file should be re-written for .NET

CoaPsyFactor, in fact the way to get this wrapper done is creating a plugin,

The problem in here is the interop between a win32 application (unmanaged code) and a .NET application (managed code).

This interop is very annoying and time consuming, it's a "freaking" task, but the final result is awesome.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ikkentim I'm a 100% sure it is harder than you think It isn't just another way of coding GM's, it is also running as an ,sub-plugin' on the server.

The running part is not the bigger problem, as I said earlier the problem here relies on interop, as explained before.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoaPsyFactor I know what you want to say, but nothing is impossible in programming I'll try to make it, if I fail, someone will success

You're right, as Einstein said before there are no impossibles, now there are for sure things that in the end (even if they work) are not reliable, because of the degradation and bad performances some solution may lead to.









And finally, to end up my bible-like post:

Yasahiro, if you need any help hit me up
I'll be glad to help you in any way I can.

I've been playing around with the .NET library that interops trough TCP/IP and if you manage to get it interoping natively it'll be LEGEN

(wait for it)

DARY!

Greetings!
And keep up the good work.
Diogo Raminhos