[RyDeR`]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gh0sT_ bumpppp

Sorry, no clue why that should happen. Maybe retry from the beginning. Also be sure you call Bit1_Set!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Double-O-Seven Since you have made the Bit_Set/Get functions general, how about making the whole syntax general? pawn Код: #define Bit<%0>:%1<%2> \     Bit%0: %1[((%2) + (32 / (Bit%0 + 1)) - 1) >>> _: (Bit32 - Bit%0)] #define SetBit<%0>(%1,%2,%3) \     Bit_Set(%1, (%2), %3, Bit%0) #define GetBit<%0>(%1,%2) \     Bit_Get(%1, (%2), Bit%0) However, I'm not sure if it works^^

I though about that while writing the syntax but unfortunately we can't just use a macros parameter after an alphanumeric character in the define itself (I tested this a several times but it didn't work for me) you have to use a different symbol (like you use < > for it) but that doesn't look good and most users are already common with the current syntax. If you know a shorter way (keeping the same syntax), please let me know - that'd be great.