What would be faster for this?
#7

100 - 200ms, i'm ASSUMING. Remember, this is an assumption, and is probably nowhere near correct. You could easily check this by creating a simple script and executing a query searching for one value 10,000 times, and then using gettickcount(); to check for the time.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
What would be faster for this? - by Whizion - 05.08.2011, 20:38
Re: What would be faster for this? - by Tigerkiller - 05.08.2011, 20:45
Re: What would be faster for this? - by Vince - 05.08.2011, 20:48
Re: What would be faster for this? - by Sasino97 - 05.08.2011, 20:52
Re: What would be faster for this? - by Tigerkiller - 05.08.2011, 20:55
Re: What would be faster for this? - by Whizion - 05.08.2011, 21:30
Re: What would be faster for this? - by Scarred - 05.08.2011, 21:32
Re: What would be faster for this? - by Whizion - 07.08.2011, 06:57

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)