21.06.2011, 10:38
I consider making a "bridge" compiler what as I understood, Simon has already made. Basically translating OO code to pawn code, which then is compiled. 1. Reason - pawn compiler may have an update. 2. Modifying may be a little harder (or easier). So that work now could be going around main topics : 1. High performance translator. 2. Available limits of OO code translating to pawn. (Which I see as - to each OO code we need to make a pawn counterexample which does "the same", for a simple example - struct which is C, but could evolve the whole code further.) And hopefully for people to use this work later, this should be in standard server package, likely as a collection of example codes, default libraries and translator-compiler. So now I'll try to make some "C/++" code into pawn (Let's make a topic only for that?).